Wave of extreme floods requires new risk mitigation plan
In mid-July, burst rivers and flash floods caused at least 177 fatalities in Germany. Parts of Rhineland-Palatinate and North Rhine-Westphalia were inundated with 148 litres of rain per sq metre within 48 hours in a part of Germany that usually sees about 80 litres in the whole of July. The water masses made houses collapse, ripped up roads and power lines, and cut off entire communities from power and communications. Floodwaters produced widespread damage to homes and swept away vehicles, bridges and other infrastructure. It is dubbed the worst natural disaster in the country in more than half a century.
Rising likelihood of extreme weather events
While there may be no proof that links the event directly to climate change, scientific models predict that such extreme flood events are likely to happen more frequently in the future as average temperatures rise on Earth.
Since the pre-industrial period, human activities are estimated to have increased the earth’s global average temperature by about 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit), a number that is currently increasing by 0.2 degrees Celsius (0.36 degrees Fahrenheit) per decade, according to data by NASA.
A warming of the atmosphere and oceans makes severe rain more likely because higher temperatures let air hold more water vapour: for every degree Celsius of warming, the atmosphere can absorb 7% more moisture. Wetter air leads to stronger bursts of rainfall.
Further, arctic temperatures are rising twice as fast as the global average, and research shows that a shrinking temperature difference between the equator and the poles weakens the jet stream. Racing from west to east, the northern jet stream transports moisture and moves masses of cold and warm air and storm systems along its path, driven partly by the temperature contrast between masses of icy air over the North Pole and warmer air near the equator. The weakening of the jet stream is making it wobblier, pinning large high and low pressure systems in place above North America, Europe, and Asia. Under the highs, temperatures often soar, while persistent rains fall where the lows are entrenched.
Source: Inside Climate News
More instances of weakened atmospheric circulation and subsequently stalled weather patterns do increase the probability of extreme rainfall events that can subsequently result in major flooding.
Writing in the journal Nature, a team of US-based researchers found that up to 86 million people, driven by economic necessity, moved into known flood regions between 2000-2015, and that the number of people exposed to floods worldwide has surged almost a quarter over the last two decades. The researchers examined satellite data from twice-daily imaging of more than 900 individual flood events in 169 countries since 2000. Computer modelling produced estimates that climate change and shifting demographics would mean an additional 25 countries facing a high risk of flooding by 2030.
The new threat levels for the population may require a review of the catastrophe communications process in place. A warning system in Germany, which includes a network of sensors that measures river levels in real time, functioned as expected, but the waters rose so swiftly, to heights beyond previously recorded levels, that many communities’ response plans were ineffective.
There was a “mass communication breakdown” between officials, media and the public in many affected areas, according to Hannah Cloke, a hydrologist at the University of Reading. The population was not aware that such extreme floods were a real threat to their lives. Consequently, the unprecedented amount of rain falling in a short period of time caught the population off-guard. Citizens took too few precautions and local authorities were ill-prepared. Experts therefore partially blame poor communication about the high risk posed by the flooding for the significant loss of life.
A costly event
More than 43,400 buildings are estimated to have been impacted by the first wave of floods in July in Europe, which affected mostly Germany but also parts of Belgium, Luxembourg and The Netherlands.
Germany’s insurance association (GDV) estimated the losses from flooding in the German regions of North Rhine-Westphalia and Rhineland-Palatinate to cost insurers between €4bn and €5bn. Further, businesses are likely to submit claims to insurers for property losses and business interruption.
Fitch Ratings expects the floods in Germany to add up to 5pp to German non-life insurers’ net combined ratios, a profitability measure. A ratio above 100 percent means that the company is paying out more money in claims that it is receiving from premiums. A rise in an insurer’s combined ratio is likely to result in higher premium for insurance buyers.
The flood costs are also set to affect reinsurers. The destruction caused to Germany and parts of Belgium is estimated to result in reinsurance losses of between USD2-3 billion, according to Berenberg analysts. The costs could be much higher, with reinsurers surveyed by Insurance Insider estimating the loss at around EUR5 billion. The costs of reinsurance in Asia and the US went up over the past couple of years as hurricanes and wildfires caused higher losses. Insurers usually pass these higher costs on to their clients.
But the total economic cost of the events will be much higher. In Germany, flood protection is not included as standard in homeowners’ policies but is available as an extension to the cover. Data by the German Insurance Association (GDV) shows that 54% of properties in Germany lack any insurance coverage against weather phenomena. In the affected region, this share is expected to be even higher. The German government is releasing additional funding to pay for the reconstruction.
"In addition to the sudden and tragic loss of life and destruction of buildings and infrastructure, floods can create an impact on the wider environment with long term pollution issues. This can include silt movement, tank losses, pipeline ruptures, lead and mercury contamination of grazing land or water supply to name a few." James Alexander, Lockton Environmental Practice Leader
Reassessing the risk
Insurers and reinsurers traditionally focused on predicting big weather events that can cause widespread damage, but due to climate change and urban sprawl, they are now increasingly incorporating secondary-peril models.
The prospect of increased frequency of extreme weather events has insurers rapidly updating their risk-assessment models and recalculating the price of insurance. Property insurers faced an estimated $18 billion bill for damage to homes and businesses from the long stretch of frigid weather in Texas and numerous other states, the equivalent of a major hurricane, The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this year.
Insurers may, in some cases, also drop coverage altogether due to the increased frequency of extreme weather events. In California, for example, some insurers chose to not renew insurance policies for homeowners in high-risk areas for wildfires after wildfires killed dozens of people and racked up more than $24 billion in insured losses in two years.
"As climate change is leading to more frequent severe weather events such as flooding, insurers continue to invest in enhanced flood mapping tools to minimise their exposure and persist to look more closely at their pricing and flood deductibles at an individual policy level to cover claims, expenses, reinsurance and provisions for large losses." Gregg Cordell, Senior Vice President, Lockton Global Real Estate Practice
Protecting buildings and infrastructure
The destruction caused by extreme rainfall partially depends on soil saturation, topography and urban development, which can prevent water from draining away.
A new generation of climate models is capable of providing more precise projections for changes in high-impact weather extremes such as short-duration heavy precipitation.
Understanding the risk for real estate and infrastructure means looking 20 to 30 years ahead through weather modelling to quantify the likelihood of an event and the likely effect on a property.
While quantifying the potential damage requires significant computing power and plenty of data, for example from governmental agencies, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can help refine and facilitate the process. Furthermore, the Internet of Things (IoT) is an important piece of technology to measure the effect of weather events and deliver the trigger basis for parametric insurance claims.
Parametric flood insurance policies use a sensor attached outside the building to collect flood data. When the pre-agreed flood depth is reached, the full insured amount is automatically paid out and the insured can determine themselves how to best spend it. Businesses can select the trigger depth and payout amounts when purchasing the product, giving them a lot of flexibility in how to design their protection. Lockton has partnered with FloodFlash, a registered coverholder at Lloyd’s of London which offers a simple and flexible parametric flood insurance policy.
Governments, companies, investors, and individual property owners should assess available data to improve protection strategies for their assets. This can, for example, lead to risk mitigation through the use of more suitable building materials, new types of architecture design, or by building protections; for example in form of flood barriers. Further, intelligence can lead to (re-) building in areas where the risk is lower. This can help reduce claims and contribute to lower interruption and more resilience.